Phantom menace.

Ever since I joined GoodReads.com, my IM conversations have been dominated with discussions of my friends’ book ratings and reviews:

Me: Holy crap.

Me: Your boyfriend gave two stars to The Phantom Tollbooth.

meredith: oh yes

meredith: he hates that book

Me: That is no way to treat a beloved children’s classic.

Me: I presume he’ll be sleeping on the couch tonight.

meredith: we have actually fought about it before

I’ve been enjoying GoodReads because it provides an inexhaustible supply of book recommendations, but I had no idea it would also provide insight into my friends’ relationship issues.  Bonus!

I am also interested in the books you love--as well as the ones that have driven a wedge between you and your significant other--so why not come be my friend on GoodReads.com.

I could (and probably will) spend hours at this.

Posted by Melissa  on  04/06  at  07:14 AM

I echo Melissa. 

And hello, how do you not love The Phantom Tollbooth?  That is one of the best books ever!

Posted by DM  on  04/06  at  07:26 AM

And I did not rate To Kill a Mockingbird as a two deliberately.  That should have been a five but did I know that the stars were sensitive to touch?  No, I did not.  I stand by my 1 star rating for that dog book.  Hated it.  But then I am not fond of anything math related.

Posted by DM  on  04/06  at  07:29 AM

Very sensitive stars (e.g. Christina Ricci) but you can re-rate, and stuff.

Posted by Greg  on  04/06  at  07:31 AM

I liked the Phantom Tollbooth as a kid, but found upon rereading it with my own child that it’s a bit too symbol-heavy for my taste. Ten- and eleven-year-olds tend to enjoy the feeling of cleverness that decoding those sorts of analogies can bring, though, thus the “it’s a classic!”

Posted by  on  04/06  at  04:36 PM

I loved Phantom Tollbooth.  AND the dog book.  The DaVinci Code was tedious.

Posted by Kelly  on  04/07  at  06:59 AM

Addiction.

Posted by  on  04/08  at  04:46 AM

I was torn between really liking some of your choices and wanting to call you pretentious.  Then I remembered somebody has to read Burroughs.

Posted by  on  04/08  at  02:05 PM

You think Augusten Burroughs is pretentious? Okay.  Personally, I find him accessible and very funny.

Posted by Greg  on  04/08  at  02:31 PM

Nah, I just think anyone with the name “Augusten Burroughs” has to be pretentious. 

Oh, okay - I’ll try to read Burroughs again.

Posted by  on  04/08  at  03:00 PM

The only book I read more than twice was “You’ll Never Make Love in this Town Again”....It’s a good book, but I can’t watch Wheel of Fortune without thinking of Vanna with another woman.

Posted by mrs g  on  04/08  at  06:31 PM

i read your page from google reader. but i guess that’s not the same, eh?

Posted by  on  04/11  at  04:10 AM

1 star for Cryptonomicon?  5 stars for Snow Crash?  That’s heresy.

Posted by  on  04/11  at  11:15 AM

Well, all I can say is, I’ve never heard of anyone who had that opinion before.  I’d rather rake a three mile lawn than read Cryptomicon again.

Posted by Greg  on  04/11  at  09:06 PM

Name:

Email (required):

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: